Just a LITTLE Gun Control?

AMAZINGLY STUPID MAN AREN'T YOU? As Piers Morgan would say.  Ever heard of teen drinking "underage?" Ever seen the videos of kids as young as 6 operating a car? DUH!  And the voting is the dumbest argument of all. Hell even dead people vote. Then you go on a rant that the girl was being supervised by an instructor. Yes but he was the dumbass who didn't STAY BEHIND THE GUN AND GIRL where he could have controlled her and the gun. The "CHILD" was learning and was training for competition shooting. But don't let facts fuck up your spin. Yes there is a more terrifying thought! Mass shootings in "GUN FREE ZONES" of unarmed VICTIMS! Children are NOT responsible enough to have the power over life and death is that why the young 11 year old saved herself and her siblings by returning fire and shooting a pair of intruders trying to kill them? Again don't dare state facts that will destroy your position.  Then you really go off the deep end with why young people shouldn't be allowed around guns. Guess using your own perspective they shouldn't be allowed around cars either, they can't drive legally so why teach them about cars? They aren't allowed to drink so why teach them about alcohol abuse and addiction? Why expose them? Then you finish off by demonstrating your lack of knowledge about guns. NEWS FLASH! Assault rifles are already illegal since to be classified as an assault rifle they have to be fully automatic and they were banned in the 1930's Regardless of magazine capacity it only takes seconds to change them eject the empty insert new magazine and your are reloaded. Contrary to the fallacy you would NOT have time to rush the shooter. 4 Handguns were used at Sandy Hook shooting.  A shotgun in the car. No "assault style weapon used. State Police and FBI incident reports. HMMM? The Magazine size was not even an issue there.  Silencers? Really? There is no such thing as a silencer! There are suppressors which do exactly that they suppress the flash but do NOT silence the gun.
Now to the question segment of this comment:
We currently have over 20,000 gun control regulations and restrictions already on the books that haven't reduced crime, stopped the mass shootings, or prevented any criminal from obtaining a gun. What new law would work when the 20,000+ haven't?
Universal  background checks have been proven to be useless do to HIPPA and other protective laws that block mental health issues from being disclosed unless there is a prior court conviction in which mental health was a determination of guilt.  All mass shooters would pass and be allowed to purchase any gun they desired. Their mental illnesses were only discovered after the shootings. So since background  checks won't stop crazy people or criminals who ignore the law what good are they?
So with 20,000+ regulations and restrictions and given the above facts which regulations and/or restrictions should we abolish?
In closing:
I know let's treat guns like drugs and create another billion dollar underground industry so every criminal will have access to any gun and the law abiding public can all be their unarmed victims just like the UK who has seen their violent crime rate soar 44% since their gun ban. Then maybe we can take the title of most dangerous place to live from them. Yes The UK is rated the most dangerous place to live in the entire EU. More Gun Control?
And you dare to ask who is being insane. Grab a mirror! None of you arguments hold water. Every example you attempted to compare has been exposed as fallacy. So unless you can present hard facts as to what new laws would accomplish that the thousands we have already can't you should man up and admit your errors.