Just a LITTLE Gun Control?

AMAZINGLY STUPID MAN AREN'T YOU? As Piers Morgan would say.  Ever heard of teen drinking "underage?" Ever seen the videos of kids as young as 6 operating a car? DUH!  And the voting is the dumbest argument of all. Hell even dead people vote. Then you go on a rant that the girl was being supervised by an instructor. Yes but he was the dumbass who didn't STAY BEHIND THE GUN AND GIRL where he could have controlled her and the gun. The "CHILD" was learning and was training for competition shooting. But don't let facts fuck up your spin. Yes there is a more terrifying thought! Mass shootings in "GUN FREE ZONES" of unarmed VICTIMS! Children are NOT responsible enough to have the power over life and death is that why the young 11 year old saved herself and her siblings by returning fire and shooting a pair of intruders trying to kill them? Again don't dare state facts that will destroy your position.  Then you really go off the deep end with why young people shouldn't be allowed around guns. Guess using your own perspective they shouldn't be allowed around cars either, they can't drive legally so why teach them about cars? They aren't allowed to drink so why teach them about alcohol abuse and addiction? Why expose them? Then you finish off by demonstrating your lack of knowledge about guns. NEWS FLASH! Assault rifles are already illegal since to be classified as an assault rifle they have to be fully automatic and they were banned in the 1930's Regardless of magazine capacity it only takes seconds to change them eject the empty insert new magazine and your are reloaded. Contrary to the fallacy you would NOT have time to rush the shooter. 4 Handguns were used at Sandy Hook shooting.  A shotgun in the car. No "assault style weapon used. State Police and FBI incident reports. HMMM? The Magazine size was not even an issue there.  Silencers? Really? There is no such thing as a silencer! There are suppressors which do exactly that they suppress the flash but do NOT silence the gun.
Now to the question segment of this comment:
We currently have over 20,000 gun control regulations and restrictions already on the books that haven't reduced crime, stopped the mass shootings, or prevented any criminal from obtaining a gun. What new law would work when the 20,000+ haven't?
Universal  background checks have been proven to be useless do to HIPPA and other protective laws that block mental health issues from being disclosed unless there is a prior court conviction in which mental health was a determination of guilt.  All mass shooters would pass and be allowed to purchase any gun they desired. Their mental illnesses were only discovered after the shootings. So since background  checks won't stop crazy people or criminals who ignore the law what good are they?
So with 20,000+ regulations and restrictions and given the above facts which regulations and/or restrictions should we abolish?
In closing:
I know let's treat guns like drugs and create another billion dollar underground industry so every criminal will have access to any gun and the law abiding public can all be their unarmed victims just like the UK who has seen their violent crime rate soar 44% since their gun ban. Then maybe we can take the title of most dangerous place to live from them. Yes The UK is rated the most dangerous place to live in the entire EU. More Gun Control?
And you dare to ask who is being insane. Grab a mirror! None of you arguments hold water. Every example you attempted to compare has been exposed as fallacy. So unless you can present hard facts as to what new laws would accomplish that the thousands we have already can't you should man up and admit your errors.

Why are my 1st Amendment rights violated. Selective harassment for preac...

Is this what America has become?

Conflicting versions of Michael Brown shooting

WHITE SLAVES--BLACK SLAVES!
Why do idiots always make it about race?

Blacks claiming their ancestor had it so bad as slaves.

Whites Claiming it wasn't them or their ancestors.

Here are some facts about Slaves! And Owners!
In1651 Anthony Johnson [a negro] was given 250 acres as "head rights" for purchasing five incoming white redemptioners.

...In 1652 John Johnson, Anthony Johnson's eldest son, purchased eleven incoming white males and females, and received 550 acres adjacent to his father.

...There were a number of additional Virginia land patents representing grants to free blacks of from fifty to 550 acres for purchasing white redemptioners. For example, on April 18, 1667 Emanuel Cabew received fifty acres in James City County, and in 1668 fifty acres were deed to John Harris of Queen's Creek. Francis Payne paid for his freedom in 1650 by purchasing three incoming whites for his master's use.
A child born to a female redemptioner could become the property of her owner and the mother's term extended. For example, George Cummins had the indenture of his white servant woman named Christian Finney extended by a year and her child bound for thirty-one years by order of the Carteret County Count on December 7, 1736. When she applied to the court for her freedom on June 9, 1744, the court ruled that she serve another five months to pay for the cost incurred by her owner to bring the earlier action. When she applied again 6 months later, she was ordered to serve an additional year for having a "Mulatto Child in the time of her servitude."  Her masters child.
So all the racial bullshit is just that. Whites had black slave masters as well as blacks had white slave masters.
The racial bullshit of well my ancestors were slaves. Slaves or Slave owners?
You name the race or nationality and at some point they were slaves or owners. If 99.9% of the people playing the race card or race baiting knew the real facts maybe 99.9% of the bullshit would end

82 shot, 14 killed in 84 hours during 4th of July 2014 weekend in Chicago

Perfect example of how well gun control works. Toughest gun control = FBI rated murder capital in the country. Armed public might have stopped some of them but then again  WTF Why would they use common sense? The name Chiraq unfortunately fits all to well. Unarmed law abiding people made victims of GUN CONTROL!  Still think it's a good thing? Works well for Chiraq's criminal element doesn't it?

Bloomberg, anti-gun advocates, and the "assault weapons" ban should FAIL

Here is the common sense reason against all gun control arguments

Here is why I say Gun Control is totally bogus. FBI 2014 report for 2013 on crime statistics resulting in death.
 323 with rifles
728 fist & feet
1,694 knives
6,220 hand guns.
8,965 total yet all we hear from the Lame Stream Media is "Assault rifles" AR-15 hunting rifle.  Why aren't we discussing banning knives since 5.2 times more people were killed with knives. Gun Control is just people control in disguise.

Operation Northwoods document

How far to deceive us? This helps explain the steps our Government will stoop too, Just to get an agenda enacted. Mass shooting on military base Fort Hood? School shootings, Sandy Hook, Va Tech and others? Public places. Aurora Col.? So many questions. Real or Government OPS? Makes you wonder! All for more control over the people?  Gun Control?

Operation Northwoods, 1967 - False Flags A Brief History -

This helps explain the steps our Government will stoop too, Just to get an agenda enacted. Mass shooting on military base Fort Hood? School shootings, Sandy Hook, Va Tech and others? Public places. Aurora Col.? So many questions. Real or Government OPS? Makes you wonder! All for more control over the people? Gun Control? Our Government attacking us?